GDPR-compliant web analytics alternative to Google Analytics using cookieless tracking, priced per site per month. · Web Analytics Platform
STOP · SKIP
5.8 ShipScore / 10
Strong time-freedom and global reach; entry barriers near zero against open-source incumbents.
Condition: Only viable if you own a distribution channel or a regulated niche (health, gov, EU public sector) that mandates data residency and audited compliance — otherwise you are the fifth cheapest Plausible clone.
Part I — The Verdict what the instruments read
§1 — The ShipScore breakdown
Control
6
Entry barriers
2
Need
6
Time-freedom
8
Scale
7
What the five commandments measure
C — Control
Do you own the customer, or does a gatekeeper (an app store, an algorithm, one platform) stand between you and revenue? High = you hold the keys.
E — Entry
How hard is this to copy? High barriers protect you once in — but a well-loved incumbent means breaking in is expensive, and scores this low.
N — Need
Is demand proven with money, not vibes — verified rival revenue, funding, exit multiples, complaint volume? No market evidence caps this at 5.
T — Time
Can income detach from your hours? High = earns while you sleep; low = you bought yourself a job.
S — Scale
How far does it reach without linear cost? High = software margins to thousands of customers; low = growth means headcount.
ShipScore = the mean of the five, scored by Opus 5 on the evidence below — the same rubric for every idea, including the ones we generate ourselves. Inspired by MJ DeMarco's CENTS framework. Full rubric →
§2 — The pace test — $1M/yr
At $14/mo (assumed category price), you need 5,953 subscribers for a $1M/yr pace.
Nearest tracked rivals on that curve:
LLM Gateway
$58k 70%
Part II — The Evidence the receipts, good and bad
§3 — Rival scan — corpus tracks 1 similar
LLM Gateway
verified MRR $58k · CENTS 6.8 (trustmrr)
Plausible Analytics — Open-source, ~$2M ARR, beloved brand — anyone can self-host your exact product for free.
Fathom Analytics — Established privacy-analytics brand with EU isolation and years of SEO/content moat at similar price.
Matomo / Umami / Cloudflare Web Analytics — Free or self-hostable options push the price floor to zero for the price-sensitive majority.
§4 — Demand evidence
Corpus evidence is effectively absent: zero funded companies tracked, zero Reddit signals for these keywords.
The only tracked adjacent product (LLM Gateway, $58k MRR) is a different category and says nothing about analytics demand.
General market knowledge shows paying demand exists (Plausible, Fathom, Simple Analytics all sustain paid subscriptions) — but that same evidence names entrenched incumbents, not an opening.
No evidence of an unmet segment, pricing gap, or complaint cluster that a new entrant could exploit.
§5 — Risks
Commodity feature set: cookieless pageview counting is a weekend build and already open-sourced.
Price floor collapse — Cloudflare and GA4 are free, Umami/Matomo self-host free.
ARPU of $9–20/site means you need thousands of paying sites before it matters; CAC likely exceeds LTV without organic content.
Ad-blockers and browser script-blocking degrade data quality, driving churn regardless of your compliance story.
§6 — Kill switches — what kills this with one decision
Browser vendors / ad-blocker lists — Adding your tracking script domain to EasyPrivacy silently zeroes customer data and triggers mass churn.
Google (GA4) or Cloudflare — A free, genuinely cookieless consent-mode tier removes the entire reason to pay you.
EU regulators / DPA guidance shifts — If exemption rules for cookieless analytics change, your core compliance selling point evaporates or becomes a legal liability.
Divergence available · Seeing the cracks? Spin the model — variations of this idea engineered to beat 5.8.
Part III — The Plan if you insist on proceeding
§7 — What this scan can't tell you
Cannot see your actual differentiator — server-side tagging, warehouse export, or vertical focus would change the entry score materially.
No visibility into current churn or pricing power at existing privacy-analytics vendors, so LTV assumptions are unverified.
Cannot assess whether you hold a distribution asset (audience, agency book, hosting platform) that would make a commodity product viable.
Scores judge the market and business model — not your ability to execute. Verified MRR = independently tracked revenue; reviews/upvotes = platform-reported. Judged 2026-08-04.
§8 — The wedge & the next step
Skip generic analytics; sell audited, data-residency-guaranteed analytics bundled with DPA paperwork to EU healthcare, gov, and fintech buyers who cannot self-host and pay per-seat compliance prices, not $9/site.
Cheapest next step: Spend three days cold-emailing 30 EU DPOs/agency owners asking what they currently pay for compliant analytics and what fails audit — if nobody names a gap, drop it.
Not quite it? Spin the model
Business-model variations of this idea, engineered to beat 5.8 — different vertical, audience, model, or wedge. Same harsh scale.
Monitor this idea
Weekly re-scan against the live corpus. If the market moves this ShipScore by a point, or flips the verdict, you hear about it. Free while we're small.
One inspection a day, by email
App Radar scans TrustMRR, Product Hunt, AppSumo, the App Store, Reddit and X daily — momentum, beatable apps, funding heat.